Saturday, June 13, 2009

Relevance? The Prosecution and Amanda Knox

Meredith KercherImage via Wikipedia
OK. But why is the prosecution asking useless questions such as : How long had she known her boyfriend before she consented to sex with him? (A: One day, I fell for him right away.) Why are they pointing out that she was wild at a party in Seattle, before she went to Perugia? Why are they asking about sex toys? What does any of this prove regarding the murder of her British roommate, Meredith Kercher? The prosecution had better have more than this to offer the jury....IMHO, it makes them look as though they have a weak case against Knox.


I had drugs and sex, Knox tells court - Europe- msnbc.com
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

No comments:

Under New Influence