Karl L Le Marcs

Do not follow this twitter.

I am trying to have this widget deleted.   See this link for FORMAL STATEMENT OF PRESS AGENT EXTRICATION FROM PSEUDONYM "KARL L LE MARCS",  GREAT BRITAIN:  http://current.com/community/93547644_pseudonym-karl-l-le-marcs-extrication-of-press-agent-from-representation-or-affiliation.htm
 SMK

A Dark Occult Philosopher cum Quantum Theorist

I have removed all blog posts and press releases on my New York sites regarding "Karl L Le Marcs " of Great Britain.
Please see this link for reasons for Press Agent formal extrication:  http://current.com/community/93547644_pseudonym-karl-l-le-marcs-extrication-of-press-agent-from-representation-or-affiliation.htm

From the Anthony Peake Forum: The Theory of CtCW and its Effects Upon Identity

Great Britain's Martin Huxter blogs from his parallel world in London: On Identity and Contradiction ,  Internet Porn ,  and Collapsing the Consciousness Wave. . .  The example of a cat in a box is always a playful one, however when pondering over parts of this theory I can't help but think of a baby being born, but never having any eyes gaze upon it at all, receiving no physical contact and then being left to somehow fend for itself, which, miraculously it finds a way to do. Obviously, usually upon it's birth a baby is observed and this stamp of observation seals it's viewed physical make-up in the world.

Social constructs such as Identity are always thought of to be exactly that, social creations formed through interactions with other observers of reality. But with regards  to, say famous people - celebrities - Is it possible that the more something is observed (collapsed) the more concrete it's identity becomes in existence? In a physical sense as well. Is the way people age, for example, a genetic thing, or is there any room for slight mutation based on the scale of observation they are exposed to?

I recall a conversation with Jake about internet porn. (excuse me for lowering the tone!) But he was making a great argument about how this particular act of ritualised observation is sending power to these particular images and clips making them more and more powerful as an influence. Hence the act of collective observation (obviously shared in separate homes - I hope!) actually gives them a stronger hold in reality.

Make any sense? Probably not. Forgive me, I tried.

Reflections of Dualsim and Empiricism : Mill and Hume Denied Transcendence of Logic and Numbers , Morality

While reading Leiter's Philosophy blog, I was just reminded that John Stuart Mill took the position that numbers and mathematics were empirically grounded, and could be known via our sensations of touch, smell, taste, sound and sight. Thus in his Utilitarian political philosophy he denied altogether the transcendent realm of Plato's Eternal ideas and forms, including mathematics and logic.

David Hume asserted that we ought to limit our public discourse only to that which is empirically real.

This is interesting right now, when religion is holding so much sway in our American politics and cultural discourse. For a long time I considered myself to be an empirical philosopher, and it is only since my husband's death, and the reading of the binary mind theory and quantum philosophy of British authors Anthony Peake  and Karl L Le Marcs  that I find myself returning to the love of Plato and Kant , and of Gnostic Christianity so beloved to me in my youth. One never really knows where one should firmly stand; philosophy is a life long study, in the classical sense, at least. Dualism is returning to philosophical discourse with a vengence, and this would appear to mirror the religious awakening which sweeps America ( I am speaking of the serious and high brow brand here, only). All fodder for the continuing dialectic; all grist for the mill, which grinds slowly and finely.

One author who has made binary mind theory  -  and in consequence,  philosophical dualsism -  popular once again in the U.S.  ,  is Peter Novak,  with his The Division of Consciousness and The Lost Secret of Death (both available @ Amazon.com.)  Novak stresses the extent to which our binary minds effect us after death;  I think a strong case can be made for the importance of their  effect on us in this life as well  ( a point Novak concedes but never explores to satisfaction).